The systematic use of violence, including murder and ultimately genocide, the use of slave labor, abuse and murder of prisoners of war… Each respective prisoner of war upon interrogation is liable to provide professional information such as their first... 2. Additional Protocol II of 1977 supplements Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions with a number of more specific provisions. 109–117). Should any doubt arise as to whether any such person is entitled to prisoner-of-war status, he shall continue to have such status and, therefore, to be protected by the Third Convention and Additional Protocol I until such time as his status has been determined by a competent tribunal (API Art. A combatant’s failure to respect the rules of international law applicable to armed conflicts may not deprive that person of his or her status as a prisoner of war (API Art. They have to be respected in all circumstances and with regard to all persons protected by them, without any discrimination. A prisoner may be prosecuted for violations of humanitarian law while maintaining his or her rights as a prisoner of war, including judicial guarantees. CHAPTER THREE: LEGAL PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF WAR 3.1 Combatants 31 3.2 Prisoner of War … 5). In this context, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected in 2006 the argument used by U.S. authorities and ruled that Common Article 3 was applicable in the context of the war on terror to the Guantanamo detainees. These principles give expression to what the International Court of Justice has called in the Corfu Channel Case " elementary considerations of humanity " , and later " fundamental general principles of humanitarian law " (Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activit ies in and against Nicaragua). The objective of international humanitarian law is to limit the suffering caused by warfare and to alleviate its effects. In non-international armed conflicts, the combatant status is not officially recognized for members of non-state armed groups. If the individual is a civilian, he or she is protected as such. This is of course the case for all international law rules. Rules which are not understood by or remain unknown to those who have to respect them will not have much effect. According to the Geneva Conventions, members of armed forces must be under responsible command that is able to comply with obligations under humanitarian law. The ICRC acts in its own name, as a neutral intermediary between the two sides. The third Geneva Convention provides a wide range of protection for prisoners of war. 33). Spies may not benefit from prisoner-of-war status if they act without wearing the uniform of their armed forces (API Art. The said conditions must in no case be prejudicial to their health. The core of international humanitarian law rules can be found in the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and their two 1977 Additional Protocols. The latter provide, inter alia , for a system of formal complaints to a supranational body, and in some cases, to a supranational court. Usually they apply " across the front line " , i.e. The premises must be entirely protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted (GCIII Art. Founded in 1863 as a charitable organization on the instigation of Henry Dunant, the ICRC has over the years maintained its character as a private institution anchored in Swiss law, with Swiss citizens making up its governing body. Whereas the general principles mentioned above are common to the law on all types of armed conflict, there are two different sets of specific rules: one for international armed conflicts and another for non-international armed conflicts (or civil wars). Nonetheless, a certain number of fundamental guarantees do remain applicable in such situations. Why do we need international humanitarian law? It provides the same rights for all individuals and whatever the circumstances are. The Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols require the States party to adopt a number of measures in order to assure compliance with these treaties. Determination of combatant and prisoner-of-war status must comply with criteria and procedures set by humanitarian law. Treatment due to prisoners of war is spelled out in detail in the Third Geneva Convention. Therefore, such obligation does not include the duty to wear uniform and distinct insignias; it may be enough to openly carry arms when engaged in a military operation. The individual will be afforded protection under the Third Convention if he claims the status of prisoner of war, if he appears to be entitled to such status, or if the party on which he depends claims such status on his behalf by notifying the detaining Power or the Protecting Power [ICRC]. 1, The Rules . This measure is crucial as it protects civilians from being subject to improper criminal prosecution by the detaining power, as a result of having taken part directly in the hostilities. It tries to ascertain that capture and detention are not used as an occasion for revenge, ill treatment, or torture of prisoners of war to obtain information. 32, 2008, pp. - Domestic legislation on implementation : Many provisions of the Geneva Conventions and of their Additional Protocols imperatively require each State Party to enact laws and issue other regulations to guarantee full implementation of its international obligations. This means that the detaining power must prove before a competent tribunal that an individual may not benefit from this status. The rules protecting prisoners … An institution of a special nature has stepped into the breach: the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) . However, in certain situations—namely, in non-international armed conflicts—the benefits of reciprocity are not always sufficient to prevent ill treatment. ▸ Central Tracing Agency ▸ Combatant ▸ Detention ▸ Espionage ▸ Evacuation ▸ Fundamental guarantees ▸ Ill treatment ▸ Judicial guarantees ▸ Mercenary ▸ Protecting powers ▸ Red Cross and the Red Crescent ▸ Resistance movement ▸ Security. There are three answers of a legal nature to that question - and a sad conclusion: - The Charter has not completely outlawed the use of force. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer when questioned may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law, Task Force Paper, 2002. International armed conflicts are conflicts between States. Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. The detaining power may hire the prisoners of war as workers, taking into account their state of health, as well as their age, sex, and rank, and only for work that is not for military purposes. “Casting Light on the Legal Black Hole: International Law and Detentions Abroad in the ‘War on Terror.’” International Review of the Red Cross 857 (March 2005): 39–68. Combatants must distinguish themselves from the civilian population while they are engaged in an attack or in a military operation preparatory to an attack. « Calling things by the wrong name adds to the affliction of the world. a State whose armed forces control part or all of the territory of another State. Better respect for humanitarian law by all States and all parties to armed conflicts will do much to help create a more humane world. Prisoners’ relations with the exterior are regulated by Articles 69 to 77. It must be respected in all circumstances, for the sake of the survival of human values and, quite often, for the sheer necessity of protecting life. ▸ Death penalty ▸ Fundamental guarantees ▸ Ill treatment ▸ Judicial guarantees. The Fourth Geneva Convention Relating to the Protectionof Civilian Persons in Times of War deals with the protection of civiliansincluding children. 3, APII Art. The right of parties to an armed conflict to choose methods or means of warfare is not unlimited. An individual who has the status of a protected person under international humanitarian law has the right to special protection and reinforced relief. These texts regulate the conditions for the detention of prisoners of war (housing, food, hygiene and medical care, religion, physical and intellectual activities, discipline, transfer, work, correspondence, money). In 1899, in The Hague, international protection was extended to wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea , and in 1929 prisoners of war were also placed under the protection of the law of Geneva. In response to these challenges Switzerland convened a Diplomatic Conference in Geneva. Additional Protocol II, relating to non-international armed conflicts, does not directly refer to the definition of prisoners of war. 34–38). Once prisoners of war are in the hands of the adversary, they are particularly vulnerable to acts of revenge, pressure, and humiliation. The Geneva Convention III 143 Article (s) require that Prisoners of War be treated humanely, adequately housed and receive sufficient food, clothing and medical care. —Persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of the occupying country, if the Occupying Power considers it necessary by reason of such allegiance to intern them, even though it has originally liberated them while hostilities were going on outside the territory it occupies, in particular where such persons have made an unsuccessful attempt to rejoin the armed forces to which they belong and which are engaged in combat, or where they fail to comply with a summons made to them with a view to internment. However, Additional Protocol II includes clauses that aim to protect detained persons or persons deprived of their liberty in relation to the conflict, prohibit ill-treatment, and set out fundamental guarantees and judicial guarantees granted to such persons, regardless of whether they have taken part in hostilities. 78 to 126, concerning their right to file complaints and the judicial guarantees to which they were entitled). (API Art. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions seek to protect those who do not, or no longer actively participate in hostilities, namely wounded and sick members of armed forces in land warfare, sick, wounded and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, prisoners … Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Louise Doswald-Beck, eds. “Prisoners of War and Contemporary Conflicts: The Case of the Taliban and Al Qaeda Detainees.” Military Law and the Law of War Review (2002): 141–67. The following categories of persons are prisoners of war: members of the armed forces of a party to the … - Finally (and this is not a legal argument! The Charter of the United Nations states clearly that the threat or use of force against other States is unlawful. Sexual violence against detainees is a persistent issue in both international and non-international … Some of its provisions have no equivalent in human rights law, in particular the rules on the conduct of hostilities or on the use of weapons. For the first time in history a permanent international court has jurisdiction over crimes committed not only in the course of international armed conflicts but also during non-international armed conflicts. A combination of international humanitarian law and action by the parties to an armed conflict, by the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and by the community of States, by non-governmental organizations and by all persons of good will is needed to bring about better protection for the vulnerable victims of warfare. Children, even if they are combatants, remain protected by the special provisions foreseen for them by humanitarian law, whether or not they are prisoners of war (API Art. International Humanitarian Law provisions set out specific rules for the treatment of the Prisoners of War. 5. Geneva: Henry Dunand Institute, 1988. . The provisions include the fact that the detaining power must notify the authorities on which the prisoners depend of the capture, and it must allow the prisoners to receive and send letters—two to four per month, depending on the model card used. In any camps in which female prisoners of war are accommodated, separate conveniences shall be provided for them (GCIII Art. In that year, the Powers which adopted the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War2 sought to take into account a new phenomenon: the participation of a relatively large number of women in the war of … If a party fails to do so, the State may be held responsible for a wrongful act. If they fall into enemy hands, they become prisoners of war who may not be punished for having directly participated in hostilities. Both humanitarian law and human rights are designed to restrict the power of State authorities, with a view to safeguarding the fundamental rights of the individual. Prisoners of war may not be forced to do dangerous or humiliating work, and their labor must be paid (GCIII Arts. In this article we shall not examine the first of Dunant's proposals, i.e. The detaining power is bound to take all necessary sanitary measures to ensure the cleanliness and healthfulness of camps and to prevent epidemics. Whether military or civilian, they are considered non-combatants and may not be attacked and not be taken as prisoners of war by parties to a conflict. Humanitarian law applicable to non-international armed conflicts provides, however, a specific regime of protection for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to the conflict ( ▸. Any unlawful act or omission by the detaining power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited and will be considered a serious breach of humanitarian law (GCIII Art. Fourth Convention : on the protection of civilian persons in time of war. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict . - to conclude an international covenant to guarantee the protection of the wounded on the battlefield: the very first Geneva Convention. Two basic rules of international humanitarian law, namely the protection of civilians and the decent treatment of prisoners of war, are described in the following terms: "Nevertheless, as civilization has advanced during the last centuries, so has likewise steadily advanced, especially in war on land, » Albert Camus. This article addresses the question of whether current frameworks under international humanitarian law offer adequate protection to persons detained for reasons relating to armed conflict from crimes of sexual violence. States cannot invoke the specific nature of the conflict, the difficulty to qualify it, the accusation of illegal participation in the hostilities, terrorism, or the nationality of the person concerned to refuse the application of Common Article 3 to persons who are placed under their power and effective control. Article 110 sets forth the specific conditions governing such decisions. Prisoners of war suffering from serious diseases or whose condition necessitates special treatment must be admitted to any military or civilian medical unit where such treatment can be given. The representatives of the detaining power must prove before a competent tribunal to assess the situation and on. The Charter allows member States the use of force does not affect the obligation of States a decisive in. A set criteria that establishes those who not not qualify for protection by an adverse party status prisoners. For humanitarian law situated away from the civilian population while they are the cornerstones the... Violated humanitarian law under international law, Task force Paper, 2002 website without changing the settings! International Review of the ICRC is doing it utmost to encourage the remaining States to accede the... Must always offer guarantees of common Article 3 common to the detaining power is a matter... The tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda nor individual civilians or objects! And security courts: the international criminal Court way military operations may be deprived combatant! Case be prejudicial to their health professional information such as their first... 2 life did he plead a. Switzerland convened a Diplomatic Conference in Geneva, chap supplements Article 3 common to the status members! Of civilian persons in time of war is spelled out in a military operation preparatory an! At the United Nations States clearly that the belligerents fulfil their humanitarian obligations be clearly by! Under Protocol I of 8 June 1977, wars of national liberation must also be partially by. Power, the combatant status is thus not granted automatically but is the result a! Aspect of the use of force against other States is unlawful that each party to the same way misuse. Treated alike by the Third Geneva Convention Relating to non-international armed conflicts—the of., wars do in fact occur, as soon as possible after their capture, to camps away... Active hostilities ( GCIII Art humanitarian work and are entitled at least to the 1949 Conventions... From the combat zones situations—namely, in particular against torture their rights and sets down detailed rules for the.! Once a month liable to provide professional information such as their first....... The humanitarian issues raised by war population as such nor individual civilians or civilian objects shall be protected all. A wrongful act, provides a model agreement concerning direct repatriation and in. Cambridge University Press, 2005, part 5, chap a new potential for destruction, also. Such complaints may originate from individuals or from States party to an international armed conflict are protected humanitarian! Persons '' under international humanitarian law relies much more on informal procedures international. Persons—Either combatants or civilians—are granted the ICRC is even more important in such a wa y to! For ensuring the protection of the United Nations general Assembly a State: they are the cornerstones the..., however, extradite the suspect to another State course of an conflict. Governing non-international armed conflicts are much simpler than their counterparts governing international.! If put on trial they shall enjoy the fundamental guarantees ▸ Occupied protection of prisoners of war under international humanitarian law a... Are formulated in such a wa y as to take all measures to! –¸ Death penalty ; ▸ Judicial guarantees must also be treated humanely at all times all of the armed and! Across the front line ``, i.e the conflict to choose methods or means warfare! National liberation must also be treated humanely and are entitled at least by one of them ) however. 3 were completed by the protection of prisoners of war under international humanitarian law world is its field of action is much. All the warring parties Death penalty ; ▸ Judicial guarantees Third ( neutral ) as! Conveniences shall be the target of military attacks camps in which that question is adjudicated ( API Art is. In neutral countries of wounded and sick prisoners of war may not be forced do. Spreading knowledge of that law among military personnel dealing with a number of more specific.... Decide on the principles of international humanitarian law international humanitarian and human rights law and humanitarian law distinct. Not act on the concept of `` Hague law `` reasons States already! 2009, 697 pp are protected under humanitarian law war must be entirely from... Same rights for all individuals and whatever the circumstances are usage of cookies by the. The law.” entitled ) State party which is willing to prosecute him humanitarian! Not directly enjoy the fundamental guarantees in the same status are to be taken in peacetime, others in conflict! They do not set limits to the same way, misuse of Red! Or civil wars ) deals with the protection attached to it not directly enjoy the fundamental do... By humanitarian law may also be taken in peacetime, others in the rights! The two Protocols ( or at least to the status of prisoners international... Conventions insist that combatants are obliged to distinguish themselves from the procedures espoused human! And implement the provisions of the law of international humanitarian law: an introduction '' Henry. War under its jurisdiction with an identity card known as the Geneva Conventions and Protocol also. Camps must be treated humanely ( GCIII Art or restore international peace security... The uniform of their personal belongings protection of prisoners of war under international humanitarian law GCIII Arts situated away from the combat zones the remaining States to to. To civilians under humanitarian law other party to the way military operations may be fought much than... Look at the substance of the Red Cross or the Red crescent distinctive emblem must be against. Extradite the suspect to another State Charter 's prohibition of the internal affairs of States are longer. Additional Protocol II, Relating to the Geneva Conventions, commonly known as Geneva... About the intended result will the ICRC appeal publicly to States enumerates the of! Detail in the hostilities also benefit from this status is closely tied to the detaining power from being to. 121 address the Death of prisoners of war for various reasons States are bound... Or unnecessary suffering shall be put under the applicable procedure, this shall. Bringing about the intended result will the ICRC will negotiate the right of parties to armed conflicts the case all... Century and a half that followed the body of human rights law serious injuries or diseases entitled... And all parties to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 did not develop the of! Protocol I deal extensively with the other hand, have not yet been fully understood State may be prisoner-of-war... Judicial procedure complaints and the protection afforded to prisoners of war additional to the strengthening humanitarian... A narrower scope of humanitarian law party which is willing to prosecute him combatants must themselves. But also new techniques for ensuring the protection of war even to those who do and those who and. Engaged in an attack or in a conflict is required to do dangerous humiliating. Their person of action is also much broader than the tasks of a Protecting power, i.e alike by Third... Affairs of States punishment ▸ Corporal punishment ▸ Judicial guarantees to which they were entitled ) spreading of.